Post by wendell on May 7, 2021 4:28:42 GMT -4
Similar questions:
will the use of Microsoft YaHei in the website constitute infringement?
This will not cause infringement. The font in the web page is matched by the font family of CSS. It only provides the system with a list of fonts. The details depend on whether the user system has this font.
Please see clearly, the background of the question is: in the page.
there are three aws certified solutions architect associate salary ways to use fonts in the page:
only use font family declaration. Reference web font through font face.
for the first way, because your website server only provides CSS declaration, the font file is provided by the user's client, So your page has nothing to do with font infringement at all. It's like you say that Xiaoming is sb, but whether Xiaoming is sb has nothing to do with you. If the subject simply states the font on the page, then there is no problem (confirmed with Microsoft and legal affairs).
the second situation is a little more complicated, It can be further divided into three situations:
if the font file is on your own server, there will certainly be copyright problems. It is better to buy it. If the font file is on someone else's server, it is the same as the first situation. If the font file is written in your CSS file by Base64 encoding, there will also be copyright problems.
font is used in the picture, If the picture also is on your server, also can have copyright to askIt depends on how you use it. If you only use CSS to refer to the user's Microsoft YaHei on the web page, then the font is owned by the user. Of course, there is no copyright problem On the contrary, if you want to embed Microsoft YaHei font into a web page and think how good it is that YaHei can be displayed on the mobile terminal, no one can protect you. ╮ ( ̄ ▽  ̄) ╭
I add @ sunny Zhou's third point
the authorization of embedding fonts in documents is described in Microsoft typography, and the embeddability of these topics is editable Document, so the use of the image does not infringe, you provide the document is infringement.
Just got on the phone with Founder's customer service. In the first case, only the font family statement is used. The answer from the customer service is that as long as the copyright font cissp blog is retrieved subjectively in CSS, it is an infringement and needs to be purchased.
Do you have any solutions? We can't just listen to founder's reply. Where can I get advice.